Showing posts with label Muhajababes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muhajababes. Show all posts

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Politicians, Dress Codes, and Losers #2, Plus Fashionable Fundies

SAGGIN' PANTS, CHASTITY RINGS - OUT!
CROCS-IN ( AND WITH PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL)!
HIJAB & NIQAB - STILL DEBATABLE


The news this past week, threw me for a loop! Besides the numerous articles on saggin' pants and the niqab, what really caught my eye was this:

“Echo”: Hijab Related Problem in BP
Now, you'd think a savvy international company, one that's been around the world for ages would be a bit more tolerant, but according to Echo / Pravo:
Thus, number of information agencies informed that girl practicing Islam and wearing headscarf in accordance with her religious beliefs was dismissed from BP. Particularly, it is reported that it was Esmira Heydarova’s religious beliefs that caused her dismissal. She worked for Sangachal terminal “BP-Azerbaijan”. It is also reported that the dismissed was warned on the part of leadership to come to work without headscarf. In response, Esmira Heydarova, declared that her clothing is expression of freedom of religion that is why she can’t take off headscarf. In the end it entailed the cease of contract with E. Heydarova.
BP ignored the laws in Texas, where fifteen workers died; in Alaska they spilled more oil; they have a disabled oil rig, "Thunderhorse" in the Gulf of Mexico; and in the U.K. they tried to lie to the court so Lord Browne could hide the fact that he had an affair with a call boy, and allowed him to use his personal business computer; and now this, a blatant attack on a woman due to her dress. And that's not all:

Following information leaked out of independent sources, E. Heydarova was officially dismissed not for wearing hijab, but for some bureaucratic impediment puts on her way by the leadership of company. It is also reported that some women-workers of BP wishing to wear hijab don’t do it fearing to lose their job.

Here's the other news on Hijab, Niqab, Saggin' Pants and Chastity Rings. It looks like the out-of-touch politicians have decided to become fashionistas. Just as an Egyptian court ruled against American University of Cairo's rule against the niqab, I'm sure an American court will rule against the saggin' pants law coming out of a small town in Louisiana. As least in the States we have a myriad of legal excuses for the way we dress. As much as I would like to outlaw some of the biggest offenders, I believe in a free society. Besides, once you start outlawing one form of dress, the ball gets rolling and you can dictate what and what not to wear. Where does it stop?

Some of my personal thoughts regarding why the hijab and niqab are becoming more popular have been confirmed, at least by some of the news reports. Yes, there is a religious movement afoot, but identity seems to be a major motivating factor. Just as we Americans decided to flaunt the love of our country by flying a dozen gazillion flags off our cars after 9-11, the women of Muslim descent decided to show their heritage, as well. Someone is going to come in a scream at me for this, but I suspect in many of these cases, just as we no longer see many of those annoying flags on vehicles, this show of faith will be deemed a passing phase too. Besides whenever you tell people they can't wear a certain type of clothing, they'll revolt by doing just the opposite, and who do the hijab salesmen thank for this upsurge in the U.K.? Jack Straw - see below.

America was attacked on 9-11 and I was living in the Arabian Gulf at the time. When we returned to the States, a month later, for a visit, we were shocked by all the show of temporary patriotism. All of a sudden, everyone was a "patriot." Those of us who chose not to fly a flag off the car, or buy those magnetic "Support Your Troops" car symbols (because we suspected someone, not the troops, was making a shitload of money at the expense of the soldiers) seemed to be in the minority. This is what I suspect is going on with many women wearing the hijab or niqab, particularly after the backlash against Muslims. It's a reaction and somewhat of a natural one, but never ever-lasting. In the Sixties kids embraced Che. In solidarity with Che's ideals and the Cuban Revolution, the Venceremos Brigade started going to Cuba (illegally) to pick sugarcane, in defiance of the U.S. Kids still wear tees with Che's silhouette etched on them. But how many of these youngsters do we see signing up to go to war or even the Venceremos Brigade? How many women wearing the niqab or hijab, which is viewed by some as extremist, would blow themselves up? Or, as some Egyptians believe, prostitute themselves?

As I said before, no one has the right to tell a woman (or men) how to dress, whether it be in a skimpy outfit at Hooters (or practically nude at the Bada Bing) or in a niqab, hijab, or a burkha, if it's her choice. As for the saggin' pants, I'm not a fan. I have to say it just spells out S-L-O-P-P-Y to me, but read on, as it might spell out something else to others. It's a prison fashion. Do you really want to be a prisoner, advertising the fact that you're "available"?

Here's the other articles, follow the links for the full dose of news worthy comments. I've included only quotes that caught my attention and to summarize the whole article for the lazy readers out there. One item that surprised me was how a woman wearing the niqab in Egypt is viewed as a prostitute, but that would jell with the comments from young non-veiling women in the book, Muhajababes. (Again- see below.)



In Vogue, Hijab Style
The recent debate over a Muslim student banned from wearing a face veil at the American University in Cairo highlighted the East-West chasm over the much-debated Muslim attire.

The right to don a hijab, the Muslim head scarf, has created a storm in European countries such as France and Great Britain, pitting Muslims and non-Muslim against each other in the name of freedom.

In Gaza, the hijab has even become an issue of life and death. Palestinian female journalists have been threatened with murder if they continued to display a bare head.

But a hijab is not only a sign of religious fervency, and contrary to Western perception, not all religious Muslim women are dressed uniformly.

A more learned Muslim will point out the subtle differences between the abaya, the jilbab, the galabiyya and the chador; or between a regular hijab, a patterned one, a burka and a niqab.
Jack Straw's controversial request for Muslim women to remove their veils has led to an upsurge in sales of the religious garment, according to one of Britain's most senior Muslims.

And his views appear to be reflected in a dramatic upturn in sales.

Research for More 4 News and Channel 4 News Online has shown that there's been a dramatic rise in the number of hijabs being worn - and for the first time there are now more than a million hijabs distributed in Britain every year.

In an interview Dr Bari said: "The veil was never an issue in the Muslim community, only a minority wear it. But when he made those comments, and certain elements of the media picked it up, it turned into a storm.

"What's happening now is that young girls are feeling
that they have to wear it: it's a sort of rebellion, a form of protest or statement.

Yunis Sidat, manager of the Islamic Establishment shop in Leicester, said: "We're selling more veils; it's a bit like when the Koran sold out after 9/11.

"I think they are selling out because people are more confident about wearing them - and there is more awareness in the general public about why people wear them.

"I can't say exactly how many more we are selling - but there has been a definite impact on sales from Jack Straw's comments."



Muslims’ Veils Test Limits of Britain’s Tolerance
Some who wear the niqab, particularly younger women who have taken it up recently, concede that it is a frontal expression of Islamic identity, which they have embraced since Sept. 11, as a form of rebellion against the policies of the Blair government in Iraq, and at home.
LONDON, June 16 — Increasingly, Muslim women in Britain take their children to school and run errands covered head to toe in flowing black gowns that allow only a slit for their eyes. On a Sunday afternoon in Hyde Park, groups of black-clad Muslim women relaxed on the green baize lawn among the in-line skaters and badminton players.

Their appearance, like little else, has unnerved other Britons, testing the limits of tolerance here and fueling the debate over the role of Muslims in British life.

Many veiled women say they are targets of abuse. Meanwhile, there are growing efforts to place legal curbs on the full-face Muslim veil, known as the niqab.

There have been numerous examples in the past year. A lawyer dressed in a niqab was told by an immigration judge that she could not represent a client because, he said, he could not hear her. A teacher wearing a niqab was dismissed from her school. A student who was barred from wearing a niqab took her case to the courts, and lost. In reaction, the British educational authorities are proposing a ban on the niqab in schools altogether.

A leading Labor Party politician, Jack Straw, scolded women last year for coming to see him in his district office in the niqab. Prime Minister Tony Blair has called the niqab a “mark of separation.”

Some who wear the niqab, particularly younger women who have taken it up recently, concede that it is a frontal expression of Islamic identity, which they have embraced since Sept. 11, 2001, as a form of rebellion against the policies of the Blair government in Iraq, and at home.

“For me it is not just a piece of clothing, it’s an act of faith, it’s solidarity,” said a 24-year-old program scheduler at a broadcasting company in London, who would allow only her last name, al-Shaikh, to be printed, saying she wanted to protect her privacy. “9/11 was a wake-up call for young Muslims,” she said.

Other Muslims find the practice objectionable, a step backward for a group that is under pressure after the terrorist attack on London’s transit system in July 2005.

“After the July 7 attacks, this is not the time to be antagonizing Britain by presenting Muslims as something sinister,” said Imran Ahmad, the author of “Unimagined,” an autobiography about growing up Muslim in Britain, and the leader of British Muslims for Secular Democracy. “The veil is so steeped in subjugation, I find it so offensive someone would want to create such barriers. It’s retrograde.”

Many more Muslim women wear the head scarf, called the hijab, covering all or some of their hair. Unlike in France, Turkey and Tunisia, where students in state schools and civil servants are banned from covering their hair, in Britain, Muslim women can wear the head scarf, and indeed the niqab, almost anywhere, for now.

But that tolerance is slowly eroding. Even some who wear the niqab, like Faatema Mayata, a 24-year-old psychology and religious studies teacher, agreed there were limits.

“How can you teach when you are covering your face?” she said, sitting with a cup of tea in her living room in Blackburn, a northern English town, her niqab tucked away because she was within the confines of her home.

She has worn the niqab since she was 12, when she was sent by her parents to an all-girl boarding school. The niqab was not, as many Britons seemed to think, a sign of extremism, she said.

She condemned Britain’s involvement in Iraq, and she described the departure of Mr. Blair at the end of this month as “good riddance of bad rubbish.” But, she added, “there are many Muslims like this sitting at home having tea, and not taking any interest in jihad.”

The niqab, to her, is about identity. “If I dressed in a Western way I could be a Hindu, I could be anything,” she said. “This way I feel comfortable in my identity as a Muslim woman.”

No one else in her family wears the niqab. Her husband, Ibrahim Boodi, a social worker, was indifferent, she said. “If I took it off today, he wouldn’t care.”

Some British commentators have complained that mosques encourage women to wear the niqab, a practice they have said should be stopped.

One woman, Sajida Khaton, 24, interviewed as she sat discreetly in a Pizza Hut, said she did not wear the veil on the subway, a precaution her husband encourages for safety reasons. Sometimes, she said, she gets a kick out of the mocking.

“ ‘All right gorgeous,’ ” she said she had heard men say as she walked along the street. “I feel empowered,” she said. “They’d like to see, and they can’t.”

She often comes to the neighborhood restaurant along busy Whitechapel Road in East London for a slice or two, a habit, she said, that shows that even veiled women are well integrated into Britain’s daily life.

“I’m in Pizza Hut with my son,” said Ms. Khaton, nodding at her 4-year-old and speaking in a soft East London accent that bore no hint of her Bangladeshi heritage. “I was born here, I’ve never been to Bangladesh. I certainly don’t feel Bangladeshi. So when they say, ‘Go back home,’ where should I go?”



According to Newsweek:

An Egyptian court has ruled that universities can't bar Islamic face-coverings. But that's unlikely to stop the headdress attracting unwelcome attention on the streets of Cairo.

A special chamber of the court ruled on June 9 that the American University in Cairo (AUC) could not bar a female scholar who wears the niqab from using university facilities.

Egypt’s battle against the niqab has a long history. Authorities originally banned students from wearing it to school in 1994, saying that it violated security standards. Dozens of pupils were suspended in the decade that followed. In nearly all cases however, the court overturned the decision and allowed the girls to return to class...However, the American University stayed firm, refusing to permit even the niqab-wearing mothers of graduates to attend the commencement ceremony, according to some students.

Certainly, the concerns run the gamut from women using the face veil to cheat in exams—be it by stashing away crib sheets or trading places with other students—to young men using it as a disguise to sneak into the girls’ dormitory. Then there are the political concerns; across the region, the increasing influence of Islamic parties poses a viable threat to the old, Western- friendly boys’ club of Arab rulers.

Certainly, the decision is a sign of the times. Just 30 years ago, young women attended Cairo University wearing miniskirts and the latest Paris fashions. They strolled along the beaches of Alexandria in skimpy swimsuits. The hijab was often perceived as a social-status indicator; women of the upper and middle classes rarely veiled at a young age and those who did usually observed more fashionable interpretations of the religious head-covering.

All of that changed along with the politics of the region. The Iranian Islamic revolution caused a religious shakeup that leaked into the Arab countries to its west. Government crackdowns on Islamic parties grew fierce as the country’s poor turned more to groups like the Muslim Brotherhood for support. Recently, the war in Iraq set off a tidal wave of anti-Western sentiment across the region, causing millions to embrace their own traditions and beliefs more proudly than ever before.

Ironically, despite the conservative trend that has engulfed the nation, the face veil is viewed by many Muslims as an “un-Egyptian” tradition and in many places, the practice is shunned. In fact, one of the stereotypes that exist among some communities is an association between the niqab and prostitution. “Prostitution is certainly one of the stereotypes for both hijab and niqab—as though these women hide behind it,” says Pakinam Amer, a Cairo-based journalist. “However, many also associate it with extremism, as well as terrorism, even here in Egypt.”

Despite the obstacles and harassment, any casual observer on Egyptian streets can see that the number of women wear the niqab is growing. Nor does it seem to be confined to specific social classes or ages. Some women insist that it is nothing more than an “outfit.”


The court, however, obliged the student to lift the veil to have her identity checked by female or male security personnel on entering the AUC compound.
CAIRO: Hala El-Malky, a presenter on Channel Five, will be the first veiled anchor to appear on a local Egyptian television station.

El-Malky was not allowed to appear on TV after she donned the Islamic headscarf. This led her to file a lawsuit against the station, which she won.

Regardless of whether we agree or disagree on the veil issue on principle, we all have to accept and respect the individual's right to decide her style of clothes, Gamal Eid, executive director for the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information, told The Daily Star Egypt.

"But we also have to accept unveiled women and not treat them with less respect than veiled ones," Eid added.

The style of dress of Egyptian women has been the subject of widespread debate as last year.

Last January, Minister of Religious Endowments Hamdy Zaqzuq expelled an employee from a meeting for refusing to remove her niqab (the full face cover).

Farouk Hosni, Minister of Culture, set off a firestorm last November when he criticized the veil and those who choose to wear it.

This trend of women covering after marriage has long been adopted in Egyptian society. Up till the last ten years, the veil was only adopted by old married women, and it was hard to find young veiled Egyptians.

However, recently the situation changed.

Over the past decade, Amr Khaled, a famous Egyptian televangelist, managed to gather many youngsters to his lectures and speeches in Cairo's most popular mosques in elite areas like Mohandiseen and Sixth of October City.

Khaled's speeches focused on the veil and as a result, lots of Egyptian girls adopted it.



British High Court Wrestles With Symbol of Premarital Purity
A 16-year-old evangelical Christian protested that her school has refused to allow her to wear a so-called purity ring, symbolizing a commitment to premarital chastity.



Just as there is a division within Islam between Sunni’s and Shites, a fashion divide has splintered Muslim women into three factions. On one side are those Muslim women who are true believers. Around the world -- in hijab hotspots -- these traditionalists are fighting for their right to wear head scarves as expressions of their religious piety. Caught in the middle -- sometimes in the crossfire -- are Muslim women who live in countries with issues on what constitutes national identity. On the opposite end of the spectrum are a new generation of young Muslim women known as “Muhajababes,” rebels who cover up to be cool, but hide their true selves behind their veils.

Their stories may surprise you.
“Take sex before marriage,” said one candid Muhajababe. “I know it is haram (forbidden by Islam) but the veiled girls . . . they are all at it.”



Thirteen-year-old Issra Omer told her parents she was too embarrassed to show up for summer school classes at Seaside High School in Monterey County on Wednesday, the day after a monitor demanded she remove her hijab (hee-JAWB) to conform to the district's no-hat policy.

Issra explained that her scarf is worn for religious reasons, but she says the school employee still yelled at her.






In Louisiana town, wearing low-rider pants may cost you
Supporters say the new ordinance aims to curb indecent behavior while opponents say it infringes on freedom of personal expression.

DELCAMBRE, La. - Buying jeans three sizes too big, young men across America, many of them black, are taunting both the laws of gravity and fashion by wearing their pants below their behinds.

But if they won't heed the age-old mother's lament to "pull your pants up," will judges have to step in to enforce a general belt-tightening?

As states, cities, and activists across the country either outlaw or hold belt rallies to draw attention to the trend of "saggin'," Delcambre, La. (pop. 1,700) last week took the boldest step yet. Getting caught with one's pants too far down could now cost $500 in fines – or six months in jail – at least on this side of Bayou Carlin.

"It's just unbelievable what they do with their pants," says Carol Broussard, the town's mayor. "What's next? Are they going to take their pants off completely?"

To be sure, it's not the first time middle America has kvetched – and even passed laws – about fashions from bell-bottoms to G-strings.

"This isn't so much about comfort or carelessness or letting something fall where it naturally falls, it's a specific look and a statement which some people have to work hard to affect, sometimes seeming to defy gravitational laws," says Robert Thompson, a pop-culture expert at Syracuse University in New York. "It represents a certain attitude and style that people are very nervous about."

Taking cues from prison culture, where belts are banned, the trend has been around for several years, moving from urban hip-hop centers like Atlanta and New York out into the boonies, and emulated not just by blacks, but Anglos, Mexicans, and Vietnamese. Some kids say it's more for comfort than a statement, even though some take on a peculiar swinging gait to create enough thigh pressure to hold on. Others just hold them up.

An informal poll in the Lafayette Advertiser newspaper last week showed 79 percent of residents support the town's ordinance. Jet Magazine, known for black style, carried an article in May that was critical of sagging.

Moreover, civic organizers in Atlanta, Detroit, Nashville, Tenn., and Birmingham, Ala., are planning antisagging rallies, says Pastor Dianne Robinson of Jacksonville, Fla., who last week handed out 78 donated belts at a "belt rally." "This sagging of the pants is to me a defiant act, and it has all kinds of implications," says Ms. Robinson, who is black. "If you can't get up in the morning and pull your pants up, that says a lot about you, even if I don't know anything about you."

The chief legal issue, experts say, is whether wearing one's pants too low is indecent, especially if all that's showing is heavily branded underwear. "This is an effort to legislate taste and morality as opposed to any legitimate case that this is indecent exposure," argues Mr. Thompson.

Here in Delcambre, where life revolves around the church and the bayou, sponsors of the antisagging law acknowledge potential legal tangles. "We don't know if we can enforce it, but we're going to try," says Mr. Broussard.

Ultimately, residents say it might be hard to catch them in the act. "When they see the cops coming, they're just going to pull their pants up," says Mr. George.



Democratic Senator Gary Siplin Wants To Ban Low Riding Pants

In what may be the biggest waste of a state legislature's time since Texas congressman Edmund Kuempel fought to get guns in the hands of blind people, Orlando Senator Gary Siplin has finally dropped his "pull up your pants bill" but not before lecturing members of the gallery on the evils of low-riding trousers.

Under Siplin's proposed amendment, which he has proposed unsuccessfully several times now, students caught wearing their pants below the waistline, or with underwear peaking out, would be punished. First time offenders get a warning, "followed by a three day suspension for a second offense and a ten day suspension for a 3rd violation." If you think that's extreme, Siplin originally proposed jail time as a punishment though that disappeared, possibly because of cries of hypocrisy. You see, the state senator "is a convicted felon, who skipped jail time in favor of parole." Perhaps this is how he knew that "[w]hen a prisoner wears his pants below the waist he's indicating that he's available for the night," as he told the crowd of sixth graders.



...he turns around and the outfit and style go down the drain. I look down to see this boy/man's pants hanging under or in the middle of his butt. He pulls his pants up repeatedly because they start to drift down as he walks, and he's perfected that slow dip walk so they don't fall down altogether...Suddenly he's not so attractive to me and I walk away with a vicious eye roll.

But there is an even more obvious reason why pants are sagging in prison. If the pants are below a man's bottom, it is to introduce to other men that he is homosexual. As Eazy E once said about women in skirts, "For easy access, baby."

But when did wearing baggy pants have to be so exaggerated? Can't they just be loose fitting but still on the waist? How is it attractive for a woman to see some man's pants sagging so far down under his butt that it looks like there's a private party going on around in his knees?

This trend increased when new citizens came out of prison and were so used to wearing their pants this way that they continued on. You know America loves a bad guy; we can see that in movies and music everyday. So, many young boys and men emulated this seemingly hardcore status...Now how is it that the actual prisoners who were used to wearing their clothes this way are now wearing suits but the boys and men who'd never make it out of jail and would cry at the thought of going are so hell bent on representing this crew? Do women a favor, guys. Pull your pants up. Sometimes your outward appearance can represent something positive or tell a lot about you, such as the attractive man I spoke of in the first paragraph, but other times it can represent something that'll turn women away regardless of how attractive you may be. However, it might turn more men to you, specifically the ones that think they can get in your pants easy, literally. If that is your preference, by no means do I have the right to judge. But if it's not, you're sending out the wrong signals to women.


Ghetto is no longer a place, says author Cora Daniels - it's a mindset. And it has traveled far beyond sagging pants on urban street corners, says the 35-year-old black New Yorker, who visited Cleveland this week to promote her new book, "Ghettonation: A Journey into the Land of Bling and the Home of the Shameless." (Doubleday, $23.95).

What is ghetto? Daniels defines it as a mindset that embraces the worst behavior instead of the best, a get-rich-or- die-trying mentality that can't fathom long-term goals and prefers immediate rewards. Her book is peppered with instances of how she, a Yale-educated writer who grew up in a Manhattan tenement, has had plenty of her own ghetto moments: She buys bootleg DVDs, for example, and has sneaked into movies at the cineplex.

Daniels, a former writer for Fortune magazine who said she felt obligated to follow the money, points out that corporations earn big profits from "ghetto" products like the toy company that markets a miniature pole-dancing kit for kids. "The most devastating part about ghetto is that it sells," she writes.

Corporate America is only doing what's natural, she said. "They're there to make money. They're not destroying their own back yard, they're exploiting someone else's." She finds it troublesome that blacks are willing consumers of the music, books and movies that depict them negatively. "We don't have to make it so easy" for corporations to make money degrading blacks, she said.

Her views sparked an introspective discussion Thursday during a book signing at Deuteronomy 8:3 Café in University Circle. One attendee said many people fear correcting the behavior of young people. "It's time for us to stand up. We are the grown- ups," a Cleveland teacher responded. "You can't say, 'I'm above it,' you've got to be in it."

Bakari Kitwana of Westlake, a nationally known hip-hop expert who attended the Friday luncheon, felt the book didn't accomplish much besides point a finger at poor people. "We continue to let the society off the hook," he said. "A much more powerful thing to do would be to challenge the industry. Instead of challenging the powerful, we're challenging the powerless."



There are a couple tricks to sagging your pants.

First, you have walk with your legs spread apart, as if on a horse. Your oversized jeans can’t fall all the way down. And when a teacher tells you to pull them up, go ahead and pull them up. You can just drop them again when you’re in the next hallway.

Cuevas keeps a few pairs of suspenders in his office, for the main offenders, but teachers are tired of dealing with it. It’s something he notices in his Hispanic students, and they do it to fit in, because they saw someone else doing it.




Hear Ye', Hear Ye' - For all those liberals wearing Crocs: Crocs Chairman hosted a fundraiser for the Virginia Republicans!

By Executive Order, Crocs Aren't Chic

Crocs have been given the presidential seal of approval but this is not necessarily a good thing.

George W. Bush was photographed recently in a pair of black Crocs -- Cayman style, $29.99 -- as he was heading out from the White House to ride his bike. He wore the clunky resin clogs -- which have ventilation holes and a heel strap -- with a pair of black shorts, a white camp shirt, a baseball cap with the image of an unidentified Scottish terrier and black bike socks imprinted with the presidential seal. He had the backstraps of his Crocs flipped forward so they rested on the top of the shoes -- turning them into slides. This subtle gesture -- coupled with the subdued color -- actually made the exceedingly unattractive shoes look tolerable.

Could they have been in a goodie bag at the May fundraiser for the Virginia Republican Party, which, according to the Associated Press, Crocs Chairman Rick Sharp hosted and Bush attended?

Crocs were created in 2002 and roared to ubiquity during the summer of 2006, just after the company went public. The company now manufactures about 4 million pairs of Crocs a month and last year had revenue of $354 million, says Mattson. Among the most enthusiastic early adopters were people who spent the major part of their day on their feet: hairstylists and nurses, for instance. They were perfect shoes for walking the dog. Gardeners found them both comfortable and functional.

Did someone say comfortable? Because this is a culture quick to justify wearing virtually anything in the name of comfort -- pajama bottoms as pants, sneakers as business footwear, leggings in lieu of trousers, Uggs with miniskirts -- Crocs now rival flip-flops as the most annoyingly omnipresent style of summer footwear. City streets are inundated with shuffling phalanxes of men and women with bright orange, yellow and red Bozo feet.

And now cold weather may no longer offer a reprieve from Croc-mania. The company has a new line of footwear: You by Crocs. The first collection, called High Spirits, will be in stores for fall. Priced from $149 to $299, the shoes and boots will have leather and suede bodies, but their platform and wedge heels will be made of Crocs's signature resin.

Monday, June 4, 2007

Hijab, Scarf, Veil- Famous Women, Who Wear/ Wore It

Some people argue against the veil, hijab, or scarf, on the basis of thinking it's totally related to Islam. Well, the wearing of the scarf, is also or has been highly fashionable. You can wear it in many different ways and as a girl growing up, I remember magazines full of photos with Marilyn and others wearing totally cool scarfs with huge sunglasses. But, I guess that was a different time. It was considered "continental style," - you know - European. Well, now the Euros have disavowed the veil, scarf, hijab, what have you and it's become a stigma to them. As a matter of fact, I'm working on a post called, "Are the French Hypocrites?" all regarding the veil. Hey, I'm loosing my hair - all I need to do is throw on a scarf and voila! - bad hair day, all gone! But that's not the issue. The veil has become something of a symbol - an object of fear and loathing; of submission; freedom of religion, and a also a fashion accessory. Oh, and I'm adding bandanas, 'cause I love 'em and I think they're relevant, besides the fact that not only I, but every member of the family wears them (thus the "Jay" photo.). If you can wear skin tight clothing with gobs of make-up and a hijab, then not wearing make-up and loose clothing with a bandana should be pretty much equivalent - don't you think?

Also, I did not add Nancy Pelosi to the photographs becasue I was afraid her big, bulging eyeballs would shatter my computer screen. Btw, Nancy's wearing of the veil when she met with Ahmadinejad was met with scorn and derision by the Republicans. Ooouuueee! Take a look below and see where they stand on this issue.

Okay, if you insist, you can see Nancy Pelosi and Condoleeza Rice wearing the hijab here: The Mahablog

So who the hell wears a scarf?

Spies do: Valerie Plame














Politicians do: Laura Bush

























Nancy Reagan:














Hillary Clinton:



















Jackie Kennedy



































Royals do: Queen Elizabeth
Camilla








Princess Diana











Princess Grace















Actresses do: Marilyn
Audrey
Sophia




















Bjorq and Catherine Denueve















Elizabeth Taylor


Aishwarya



















Angelina




Jay(?) - Okay, he thinks he's a "lady".

Hijab in the News

Some articles about veiling have cropped up in the news recently: In Iraq a letter being circulated demanding Christian women to veil up; A reply to that and a report on the Christian community in Iraq; In Gaza, female reporters are being threatened by beheadings; maids in Saudi Arabia and veiling laws; and a designer who will be showing updated hijabs for the runway. But, first, an editorial about the veil and Islamists, which I think really strikes at the heart of the issue for me and my ruminations about the hijab renaissance. But, as evidenced in the other articles, the argument by extremists in favor of veiling, are accompanied by violent threats. Thus making the veil a symbol of submission, and feeding the fears of reactionaries and Islamophobics everywhere.

Islamists, women, and the veil!

The dilemma is such - the rise in bearded men and veiled women is supposed to correlate with an increase in morals and values that are clearly enshrined within Islam. That unfortunately isn't the case, and hence one has to question the validity of the rise of such Islamic fervor, at least at the attire level.

The debate at this point will center on two notions: Is the veil just as much as the beard and the short dishdasha (long white robe men wear) symbols of religiosity? Are people supposed to judge other people's submission to God, based on their attire? Furthermore is religion something physical or is it rather a metaphysical belief system that emanates from within as opposed to an expression that is visible from the outside?

In analyzing both the veil and the beard, I have noticed that there are many forms of 'Islamic' veils available, some more 'liberal' than others, some that are purely decorative in nature (a cloth covering one's hair, with spandex-type of dress that doesn't even seem to be a perfect match!), while others perhaps are more 'religious.' The question that I would like to ponder upon is the following: If the purpose of the veil is to simply cover a woman's hair then perhaps a wig would perfectly do the job, for it would also cover a woman's hair, yet inherently a wig would seem to beat the purpose of the veil (i.e. hair covering) for it reveals a new set of hair instead of the real hidden one!

This leads me to the next question - is the veil something visual or rather something symbolic? The question, should a women be veiled or not, is a purely an individual choice in nature and hence a matter that is up to the individual person (a notion that fellow Islamist brothers would completely disagree on)! The same notion is applicable to the beard. In coming up with a conclusion I believe that deeds will outweigh attire any day; for attire without deeds just doesn't seem quite right and I believe that what is to be emphasized is that as long as decency is achieved in both attire and action, veiled or unveiled, bearded or not, only God has the capacity to judge our actions on the day of judgment.



Islamists to impose the veil on Iraqi women

A letter is circulating the capital, warning Christian women to wear the veil in accordance with domestic segregation. The letter is signed by the Mahdi army, linked to Moqtada al-Sadr, the radical Iraqi Shiite cleric, who the US considers the greatest threat to security in the country. Upon till now the Sunni group of “the Islamic State in Iraq” was the most violent threat to the Christian community: from their imposition of the jizya – the “compensation” demanded by the Koran from non Muslim subjects – to their expropriation of property and forced conversions to Islam.


Iraq Sadr Spokesman Denies 'Veil For All' Edict
"Moqtada al-Sadr has never issued such an order neither in private nor in public" he added.

"The Sadrist faction, in line with its religious role, urges Muslim women to wear the veil as prescribed by sharia (Islamic Law) but does not force them to do so, just encourages them"

"As for non Muslims, it is a personal question, but they must not approach holy Shiite sites.

Abu Zahra went on to underline that "there have never been any incidents involving a Sadr member towards a non Muslim in the areas of Iraq where the group is present."

A responsible for the Waqf office (in charge of Sunni religious heritage) speaking on condition of anomymity, told Adnkronos International that "Islam does not force anyone except its own followers to adhere to Sharia law and is nto responsiblefor those of other religious faiths. This is contrary to our faith, which obliges us to look after non Muslims who live in Muslim countries without forcing them to embrace Islam."

The Sunni official said he could not rule out "a link between this episode [the letter], if it really did occur and the systematic campaigns currently underway to drive Christians out of Baghdad and of other Iraqi cities,forcing them to go abroad or to other areas of the country."


Iraq: Christian population dwindling due to threats, attacks

Insurgents laid siege to the Al-Durah neighborhood of Baghdad earlier this month and demanded that Christians living there pay jizya, a head tax on non-Muslims living under Muslim rule, to the mujahedin or else convert to Islam. The Islamic State also hung posters throughout Al-Durah calling on Christian women to veil their faces. Locals report that nearly 200 Christian families have fled the neighborhood recently with just the clothes on their backs.

In other cases, families have been given 72 hours to pack their belongings and leave. Some have fled to Kurdistan, but the majority have left for Syria and Jordan, Christian leaders say.

Shi'ite militias have also targeted the Christian community. Fighters loyal to Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr this week warned Christians in Baghdad to wear the veil or face grave consequences, aina.org reported on May 30. A statement issued by al-Sadr's Imam Al-Mahdi Army rationalized that since the Virgin Mary wore a veil, present-day Christians should too. The statement claimed that the militia has formed committees to monitor Christians and enforce the veiling decree.

The statement, signed by the "People's Foundation for the Master Al-Mahdi Army," referred to the writings of Muhammad Sadiq al-Sadr (Muqtada's father) who the group claimed ruled, presumably through a fatwa, that women who did not veil themselves were adulteresses who should be locked up by their husbands if they refuse to veil their faces.

There is little question that the targeting of minority communities has had an adverse impact on Iraq, a country that historically was known for its diversity. Already by some estimates, only 200,000-400,000 of the 1.5 million Christians living in Iraq in 2003 remain. For Iraq's Christians, many of whom trace their presence in the country to their Assyrian ancestors, the impact of such displacement is immeasurable.


'Wear a veil or we will behead you,' radicals tell TV women

All 15 women presenters reported for work at the official Palestine Television station in Gaza yesterday, in defiance of death threats by a radical Islamic group that is believed to have links with al-Qa'ida. The Righteous Swords of Islam warned that it would strike the women with "an iron fist and swords" for refusing to wear a veil on camera.

"It is disgraceful that the women working for the official Palestinian media are competing with each other to display their charms," it said in a leaflet distributed in Gaza at the weekend. "We will destroy their homes. We will blow up their work places. We have a lot of information about their addresses and we are following their movements."

The fringe group threatened to "slaughter" the women for corrupting Palestinian morals. "The management and workers at Palestine TV should know," it warned, "that we are much closer to them than they think. If necessary, we will behead and slaughter to preserve the spirit and morals of our people."

About half the women TV journalists wear the traditional hijab head covering, but all show their faces and wear makeup. They mounted a vigil yesterday outside the Gaza City office of the Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, demanding protection and respect.

Lana Shaheen, who heads the station's English-language programmes, told The Independent: "Of course we are afraid. Previously this group threatened Internet cafes and video shops, then burned them. We will protect ourselves."

She insisted the women would continue working. "We will not change... our lives. We've worked through Israeli bombardments and attacks, just like the men. It's a national obligation."

In recent weeks, militants campaigning against Western influence have also vandalised an American school and a Christian bookshop. Bassam Eid, director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, accused the radicals of behaving like the Taliban in Afghanistan. "Gaza has become Hamasistan. They are trying to drag Palestinian society back to the dark ages."

As the prospect of peace recedes and poverty spreads, Palestinians have become more traditional. Bars and cinemas have closed. Many educated, middle-class women now cover their heads, but hardly anyone, even in the villages, wears the niqab veil.

Forcing Maids to Wear Veil

Laila Al-Hilali, a Saudi researcher, referred to a contradiction in the way that some families oblige their maids to wear veils in public and ignore other “priorities.” “A maid’s appearance in public attracts the attention of the families they work for, who tend to ignore other serious issues such as how committed the maid is to her work, or how she treats the kids when the parents are away,” said Al-Hilali.

Shariah expert Dr. Suhaila Zain Al-Abedin, told Arab News that the Kingdom’s domestic work force make up a quarter of the expatriates living in the Kingdom. “This huge work force needs to be educated about our culture, society, religion and the whole point of hijab, which is a symbol of modesty and has been prescribed to protect women from molestation in public. Women have never been forced to wear it,” she said.

“A maid should be treated like a human being by her employers, not like a slave. She should be given the freedom to choose if she really wishes to wear the hijab without being obliged... Housewives must treat their maids with respect and not terrify them. This may lead them to hurt their employers,” she added.


Tanveer unveils dodgy veil

Glodwick resident Tanveer Ahmed is in his final year at Northampton University and has gained coveted catwalk time at the annual Graduate Fashion Week at Battersea Park, London, on June 3.

The 21-year-old said: "My stance is not to remove the veil as such but modernise it and make it more fashionable.

Tanveer also knows he will receive criticism from many quarters of the Muslim community.

"I’m also frustrated with fundamentalists who tell you what to do. I’m trying to show that there is another side to the coin," he challenged.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Hijabi Fashion or "Fashionable Fundies"

When I moved to Cairo, I noticed a lot of young women wearing the hijab. In the U.A.E. many of the Emirati women wear the abaya, with some of the older or married women completely veiling. But there it was described as a “traditional” practice, and during the holidays (Ramadan, Eids) you’d see more women wearing the abaya out of deference. In Baku, as time passed, I noticed more and more women wearing the hijab. In both those instances modesty was practiced religiously, so-to-speak. Here in Cairo, young women are wearing the hijab while dressing in skin-tight clothing, wearing make-up and a variety of hijab styles. When Number One Son visited in March, we had a discussion: Was it "in style / fashionable?" Was it a political statement?




Or as the Boss Man pointed out, was it a requirement set down by the parents? As one female co-worker told him, her parents demanded she veil if she had to work with “westerners.” If this is the case, the parents must be blind to allow their daughters to walk out of the house wearing revealing clothing and thinking a headscarf was sufficient protection.

Hey people - It’s not a condom and it’s not a chastity belt as attested to here:

Cairo street crowds target women, By Magdi Abdelhadi - Arab affairs analyst, 1st November 2006, BBC News:

Egyptians are horrified by the news that women have been assaulted by hordes of young men in the centre of the capital, Cairo.

The incidents were first reported online by Egyptian bloggers, some of whom saw large number of men harassing the women and ripping off their clothes.

It all happened over the Eid al-Fitr period starting on 23 October, as thousands of young men thronged the streets of central Cairo to celebrate the end of the fasting month of Ramadan.

One blogger who took pictures of what happened dubbed the incidents "sexual voracity down town".

According to the bloggers, the attackers targeted veiled as well as unveiled women who happened to be on their own.

The state media ignored the incidents, but ordinary Egyptians where shocked when they heard for the first time eyewitness accounts broadcast on the private television channel Dream.


Two weeks ago, I found a book I hoped would clarify the situation. Instead, it just muddled things up. Then I started scrounging around on the Internets, only to be thoroughly amazed at what a hot topic the hijab has become. I say “hot” as in – what’s “in” and what’s “out.” And the hijab is apparently, very “in” right now, in certain circles, as in "fashionable," and "hot" as in a "hot topic" for news. That still didn't answer my questions, but at this point, I think I may just give up looking for definite answer. I've decided it's a combination of things: newfound religious beliefs among the young, pressure by parents and it is a fashion statement. What that statement is, is another question.

In, muhajababes: meet the new middle east – cool, sexy and devout, by Allegra Stratton, the author sets out to find the Haight-Ashbury type revolutionary happenings of the Middle East (channeling Jer-ry!) She tries to connect the music video scene with these “babes” and doesn’t connect the dots. She has some juicy, gossipy type tidbits and facts that are interesting, but as a whole, the book was lacking.

She eventually focuses on a group of young women referred to as "veiled again" ("born again") Muslims and who have been influenced by Amr Khaled, who was just named one of TIME 100 People Who Shape The World. Amr Khaled is a major influence on the “veiled again” phenomenon. Of course he’s the so-called Dr. Phil, Billy Graham, neo-televangelist of the Arab world and he’s got the merchandising to make him a new pop Islamic guru:

Khaled's fame has grown astronomically, particularly among well-to-do Arab women and youth, many of whom are struggling to reconcile their "Westernized" lifestyles with the powerful pull of a regional Islamic revival....


Khaled is exemplary of this new brand of "veiled-again" Islam that represents the most significant departure from classical approaches to Islamic television programming to emerge in the last few years, ushering in a "new wave" Islamism for a different generation of viewers.
Amr says:
“First you should know that ALLAH ordered all Muslim girls to wear hijab to protect them and to protect men from temptations "al fetan" and also to honor and respect her body from every eye and every instinct or lust.
The major problem about not wearing hijab is that you are being sinful by committing a "zanb" for every time a man looks at you.
So if a man looks at you he gets a zanb and you get one zanb but if a thousand men look at you each one of them gets one zanb and you get the thousand.
The worst thing is that every one of them can ask GOD for forgiveness because he knows he committed a sin by looking at you and ALLAH forgives him but you can't ask for forgiveness for all those zonoob as long as you still don't wear your hijab .Don't say i didn't tell them to look at me or my hair or my body.

Just because Amr says so doesn't mean it's the only argument around. Take for instance a very recent proclamation by Ezzat Atiya, a lecturer at Al-Azhar Islamic University. According to The Daily Star Egypt:
Cairo's Al-Azhar Islamic University on Monday suspended a lecturer who suggested that men and women work colleagues could use symbolic breastfeeding to get around a religious ban on being alone together.
The lecturer, Ezzat Atiya, had drawn on Islamic traditions which forbid sexual relations between a man and a woman who has breastfed him to suggest that symbolic breastfeeding could be a way around strict segregation of males and females.

The Dubai-based channel Al Arabiya quoted him as saying that after five breastfeedings the man and woman could be alone together without violating Islamic law and the woman could remove her headscarf to reveal her hair.

Huh? That sounds a bit too kinky for me! The quest for hijab knowledge continues.

My Internets surfing led me to the following articles about the hijab and raising Muslim girls.

From the Fashion & Style Section of the New York Times:
We, Myself and I
, By RUTH LA FERLA, Published: April 5, 2007
The demands of faith, family and Western culture test the fashion identities of Muslim women in the United States.

Injecting fashion into a traditional Muslim wardrobe is “walking a fine line,” said Dilshad D. Ali, the Islam editor of Beliefnet.com, a Web site for spiritual seekers. A flash point for controversy is the hijab, which is viewed by some as a politically charged symbol of radical Islam and of female subjugation that invites reactions from curiosity to outright hostility.

In purely aesthetic terms, the devout must work to evolve a style that is attractive but not provocative, demure but not dour — friendly to Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

“Some young women follow the letter of the rule,” Ms. Ali observed. Others are more flexible. “Maybe their shirts are tight. Maybe the scarf is not really covering their chest, and older Muslim women’s tongues will wag.”

Young Muslims in Cairo transform the hijab, By Jill Carroll | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, From the May 16, 2007 edition

The head covering may be a sign of piety – but it can also be a declaration of identity and fashion sense.

Hijab salesmen – most are men – say that business has boomed in the past few years.
Hijab Chic, By Asra Q. Nomani, Posted Thursday, Oct. 27, 2005, at 4:38 PM ET
How retailers are marketing to fashion-conscious Muslim women.

The morning of the event, about 100 women—their hair covered by scarves, their bodies cloaked in abayas or burqas, and at least two of them with their faces fully veiled—pulled into the Tysons Corner parking lot in Volvos, BMWs, and Lexus sedans. In liberal Muslim circles, these women are sometimes derisively called "hijabis." The chicest among them—those who wear silk Hermes scarves and long Barneys jackets—are dubbed "fashionable fundies" (as in "fundamentalists"). The women call themselves "muhajabah," or "women of hijab."

Dhahran women push the veil aside
, By Betsy Hiel, TRIBUNE-REVIEW, Sunday, May 13, 2007

In Jeddah, the restrictions seem a bit relaxed.
Some women there refuse to wear veils. Clothing designers are reinventing the required long black robe in slimmer, form-fitting styles with colorful embroidery or sequins on the sleeves, hem and back. A shop sells designer abayas -- one with a sequined kitten in a cowboy hat playing a guitar, another with leopard-print sleeves and hood.

The meaning of freedom,
Muslims and the veil in the Economist, May 10th 2007 | ANKARA, CAIRO AND TEHRAN
From The Economist print edition
In every corner of the Muslim world, female attire is stirring strong emotions

In Pakistan last year, an assassin shot dead a provincial government minister, judging her gauzy head covering not Islamic enough. In January a clash between Tunisian police and Islamist rebels left 12 dead. The rebels said they were “defending their veiled sisters against oppression”, a reference to the fact that Tunisia's president dismisses the hijab as an alien form of “sectarian dress” and has sent police to toy shops to seize dolls with scarves.

Among most Muslims, who live between such extremes, two broad trends have emerged. One is a general movement towards more overt signs of piety, including “Islamic” attire. Within the past two decades, modern forms of head covering have become standard fashion in countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Malaysia, Morocco, Sudan and Yemen, replacing both traditional country scarves and the exposed coifs that were inoffensive to an earlier generation of city dwellers.

On the streets of Cairo, the Egyptian capital, headscarved women form a very visible majority. In the Egyptian countryside, where women used to work the fields uncovered, veils are now universal. Even gloves are not uncommon. Wearing the hijab is now so popular that it has ceased to be a statement, says Hania Sholkamy, an Egyptian anthropologist. “In fact, it is getting hard to shop for what used to be ordinary clothes,” she says. “Islamic dress is cheaper and more available.”
From Marie-Claire Magazine:
Shopping In Dubai

What's it like to go shopping when your wardrobe consists of long, black robes? Two chic Dubai women took us on a fashion caravan to find out
By Carrie Sloan
HEAD-SCARVES BY CAVALLI
Dubai doesn't have fashion police -- or religious ones. Bin Kalli and Al Hamly aren't required to wear these robes; they choose to. "We're proud to wear the abaya," says Al Hamly. "It represents our culture. We can look glamorous and good and still be covered up." "Dubai is an expanding city -- there are more expats than locals now," bin Kalli adds. "The abaya helps us differentiate ourselves from the nonlocals."
These two articles were part of the November-December Marie-Claire Magazine focus "Mecca Stars" and hijab style clothing. There are websites that have the photos, but the one with a vitriolic, reactionary bent had them all: Debbie Schlussel.


Debbie Schlussel:
Hijab-Encrusted: Feminist Mag Shows Women the New "Sexy"; Medieval Black is the New Black

By Debbie Schlussel

And now for the latest edition of "Reading Women's Mags So You Don't Have To--See What Your Wives/Daughters/Girlfriends Are Reading":

Marie Claire has done it again. The magazine which equates our female soldiers with female Islamic terrorists; the magazine which claims that Islamofascist TV broadcasts are liberalizing the Arab world (Ha!); the magazine which hates Christianity and loves women's lib--that magazine suddenly has selectively, yet again, discarded its feminist ethos to show us what it hopes will be a new fashion trend.

It's lovely how women who think they're so liberated they'll cheer anything anti-American, are embracing their future enslavers. Don't let the cover of December's Marie Claire fool you. Inside are not photos of Ashley Judd's breasts, like on the cover. Instead, lurking inside is a 13-page spread of Islamofascist fashion . . . and an article cheering a lawyer for Gitmo terrorists. Yes, this mag is full of chic . . . or full of something that sounds similar:
Needless to say, Debbie's got issues. Let's move forward in our search for hijab knowledge.
Which leads us to the question of, how does a "muhajababe" or a "fashionable fundie" learn about all of this?

Regardless of what Debbie says, if your parents are open-minded, you might want to check out Marie-Claire magazine, which seems to have taken up the issue of not just fashion, but also feminism in the Arab world.
The Revolution Will Be Televised
The fluffy precinct of girl talk and pop stars, Arab chat shows are changing the way women think in the Middle East. Will the real battle for hearts and minds be played out on the boob tube?
By Carla Power

On a softly lit set transformed into a chic, minimalist living room, five Arab women sit on orange and yellow couches, gossiping and laughing in front of a live studio audience. Another episode of the Arab world’s top-rated TV program, Kalam Nawaem—which roughly translates as Sweet Talk—is underway. Modeled on American hit The View, Kalam Nawaem, broadcast out of Beirut, is a potent mix of cozy chat and edgy issues.

Its four hosts include a Palestinian actress, a Lebanese TV veteran—their blue-jeaned, blowdried sleekness straight off Madison Avenue—and a maternal Egyptian self-help columnist, a sort of Muslim Dear Abby. Only one host—Muna AbuSulayman, a Saudi Arabian working on a Ph.D. in American literature—is veiled, her shimmering hijab the shade of moonbeams.

Veiling happens to be the topic for today’s show. “Congratulations on taking up the hijab!” AbuSulayman says enthusiastically, smiling at Kalam Nawaem’s first guest, actress Hala Shiha. Known for her sexy film roles and scanty outfits, the young Egyptian star stunned her followers by recently deciding to wear the veil. “I’m really at peace—wearing the hijab gives me true power,” Shiha says, her head swathed in a bright orange polka-dot scarf pushed back to expose her amber eyes. The audience’s women—most with carefully coiffed manes, some in shoulder-baring halter tops—applaud wildly.

If you're a Muslim-American teenage girl you can read: Muslim Girl Magazine, which even has a section called, "Style Your Hijab! Cool covers for hot summer days." It was a response to magazines directed at teenage girls, such as CosmoGirl that were considered shallow and risque, and did not address life for the Muslim-American teen girl.


Or, you might like to read:


Does my head look big in this?
2nd June, 2006
by Tanzeel Akhtar
Freelance Journalist
Amal Abdel-Hakim, a 16-year-old Palestinian-Australian, is about to begin Year 11. Suddenly she decides to take a big step and wear the hijab
Amal's journey is fictionalised in a new book by Australian lawyer Randa Abdel-Fattah (pictured). The 27 year old "Palestinian-Egyptian-Australian-Muslim," as she describes herself, has written 'Does My Head Look Big in This?' almost as a handbook for non-Muslims to understand the trials and tribulations of young Muslims coming to terms with their faith.





And if you're too young to read Muslim Girl Magazine, your parents can buy you a
Fulla Doll, described as,
A Girl's Dream Doll
Fulla-the little girl that wears modest outfits, her top priorities are respect for herself and all around her and being kind to her friends and peers. We take pride promoting virtues to help girls be the very best today so they will grow up to be the women who make a difference tomorrow.
Hmm. Do they mean like these women?

Needless to say, wearing the hijab is a woman's choice and should not be forced upon her, nor outlawed as is the trend in some European countries. It's a form of freedom of expression and freedom of religion; to some, a fashion statement, and to others something to fight against, such as what follows:

Police, Improperly Clad Women Clash In Tehran a post on The MEMRI.blog, shows a bloodied woman who was beaten by the police for not abiding by the "Islamic Dress Code."

Other signs of resistance:An iranian Badhijab girl hits a Bahijab policewoman!!!



Still a question facing many Muslim women.
On Being
Uzma Enayatulla: Talks about being First Runner-Up in the 2001 Miss India USA Pageant and her decision to eventually wear the hijab and dress modestly.
I'm really not a pageant girl. It was just, like, a once-in-a-lifetime thing.



Eid Adha & the Missing Hijab: Here a girl argues why she decided not to wear the hijab; but she wore it for awhile, then changed her mind, and maybe might wear it again. Suffice it to say the girl's got a dilemma, and she's not getting any help from the male Islamic interviewer.







For me, my questions are just out of curiosity. I'm sure the young women who have to make the choice to wear the hijab or not, have many more questions, deeply personal, pertaining to their faith and spirituality. Questions that put mine to shame. As
Uzma Enayatulla describes in her video, it took some time and a gradual phasing in of all the components. And, as evidenced from Eid Adha & The Missing Hijab video, it's a big step for many of these girls. Perhaps, some of the young women do find it in vogue to wear the hijab. That's fine. Perhaps a few of them are still working it all out and will eventually dress modestly. That's fine too. Unfortunately, depending on the circumstances, they're damned if they do, by reactionaries like Debbie Schlussel who would like to strike fear into the hearts and minds of people less aware, and damned if they don't, by the likes of the hijab police in Iran and others of a like mind, who use fear, as well - thoughts that probably play a role in their decisions. And these fears just complicate the issue even more.